[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47436E7F.2060901@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:32:15 -0800
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
CC: Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc3: find complains about /proc/net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Roland McGrath wrote:
> Oh, it seems it has indeed been that way for a very long time, so I was
> mistaken. It still seems a little odd to me. Ulrich can say definitively
> whether the kind of concern I mentioned really matters one way or the other
> for glibc.
glibc cannot survive (at least NPTL) if somebody uses funny CLONE_*
flags to separate various pieces of information, e.g., file descriptors.
So, all the information in each thread's /proc/self should be identical.
When the information is not the same, the current semantics seems to be
more useful. So I guess, no change is the way to go here.
- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHQ25/2ijCOnn/RHQRAmhhAJsHRF7FqO8DWwZ97gHxIO/i4Z1AAQCffCGa
Q2J8kjthKbbNQf1USWMAw3Y=
=xl/a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists