netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without socket filter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47427DD3.9030700@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:25:23 +0800
From:	Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	billfink@...dspring.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without socket
 filter

David Miller said the following on 2007-11-20 14:15:
> From: Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>
> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:29:45 -0500
> 
>> But the best approach seems to be just not to count
>> it in the first place until tha application has actually received
>> the packet, since as Herbert pointed out, that's what the RFC
>> actually specifies for the meaning of the udpInDatagrams counter.
> 
> I agree and would be happy to apply such a patch :)
> 
> 
> 

I want to wait for more suggestions until make such patch.
Because this solution leads to troubles with some apps, such as NFS.
(http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6660#c2)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html