netdev - Re: RE: is it useful testing __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED in dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071121085447.GA28411@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:54:47 +0800
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	wyb@...sec.com.cn
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RE: is it useful testing __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED in dev_close()?

On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 03:09:52PM +0800, wyb@...sec.com.cn wrote:
> 
> __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED still exist in kernel 2.6.23.8.

You'll find that it's gone in 2.6.24-rc3.  In any case, the code
was racy but it's too unlikely (and the fix too intrusive) to be
worth fixing in 2.6.23 at this stage.  

Thanks,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html