netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] [TCP] MTUprobe: Cleanup send queue check (no need to loop)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071122110046.GA8592@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:00:46 +0800
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
Cc:	John Heffner <jheffner@....edu>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] [TCP] MTUprobe: Cleanup send queue check (no need to loop)

On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 06:01:28PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> The original code has striking complexity to perform a query
> which can be reduced to a very simple compare.
> 
> FIN seqno may be included to write_seq but it should not make
> any significant difference here compared to skb->len which was
> used previously. One won't end up there with SYN still queued.
> 
> Use of write_seq check guarantees that there's a valid skb in
> send_head so I removed the extra check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>

OK, this one looks pretty straightforward.  I'll put it in once
we resolve the other patch.

Thanks,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html