[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200711222157.JIE05256.SQOFHFVtFJLOMO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 21:57:14 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [README] away until Dec 3rd
Hello.
I have a question.
Yesterday, I posted a patch based on 2.6.24-rc3-mm1 that modifies
the following files.
include/linux/security.h | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
net/core/datagram.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
net/socket.c | 7 +++++--
security/dummy.c | 13 ++++++++++---
security/security.c | 10 ++++++++--
But you say that I should make patches based on the net-2.6.25 tree.
Which tree ("-mm" or "net-2.6.25") should I use for making this patch?
There is no pending objection at LSM-ml so far, and
I'm asking for an approval from one of the core developers at netdev-ml.
Regards.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists