netdev - Re: [PATCH][UNIX] Move the unix sock iterators in to proper place

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4746D130.2060305@openvz.org>
Date:	Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:10:08 +0300
From:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC:	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][UNIX] Move the unix sock iterators in to proper place

Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 04:22:30PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> The first_unix_socket() and next_unix_sockets() are now used
>> in proc file and in forall_unix_socets macro only.
>>
>> The forall_unix_sockets is not used in this file at all so
>> remove it. After this move the helpers to where they really 
>> belong, i.e. closer to proc code under the #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>> option.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
> 
> Patch applied.  Thanks Pavel!

I'm afraid to become importunate, but is the net-2.6 (not 25)
tree is currently the David's tree (unlike net-2.6.25, which
has temporary switched to your one)?

Thanks,
Pavel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html