lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:04:58 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Emilian.Medve@...escale.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, galak@...e.crashing.org, leoli@...escale.com,
	paulus@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/8]
 ucc_geth-fix-build-break-introduced-by-commit-09f75cd7bf13720738e6a196cc0107ce9a5bd5a0-checkpatch-fixes

On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:58:51 -0500 Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:

> akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > 
> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> > Cc: Emil Medve <Emilian.Medve@...escale.com>
> > Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
> > Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@...e.crashing.org>
> > Cc: Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>
> > Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/net/ucc_geth.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff -puN drivers/net/ucc_geth.c~ucc_geth-fix-build-break-introduced-by-commit-09f75cd7bf13720738e6a196cc0107ce9a5bd5a0-checkpatch-fixes drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
> > --- a/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c~ucc_geth-fix-build-break-introduced-by-commit-09f75cd7bf13720738e6a196cc0107ce9a5bd5a0-checkpatch-fixes
> > +++ a/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
> > @@ -3443,7 +3443,7 @@ static int ucc_geth_rx(struct ucc_geth_p
> >  	u16 length, howmany = 0;
> >  	u32 bd_status;
> >  	u8 *bdBuffer;
> > -	struct net_device * dev;
> > +	struct net_device *dev;
> 
> ACK with a fixed description...
> 

Well...  I do these little fixups

a) to remind originators that they should be checking their stuff with
checkpatch

b) to fold into the offending base patch prior to sending upstream

c) to let upstream (in this case you) know that the patch had coding-style
problems.

as it appears that you merged the base patch without noticing the error,
and without running checkpatch I don't think it's worth merging a silly
one-liner like this on its own.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ