[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071124141319.GA27819@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 22:13:19 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: dsd@...too.org, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wireless vs. alignment requirements
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 02:49:36PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> Right. I just didn't think that would be a valid value for an
> architecture to set.
OK. Let me clarify this a bit more. We require at least one
of the following rules to be met:
* the IPv4/IPv6 header is aligned by 8 bytes on reception;
* or the platform provides unaligned exception handlers.
So if your platform violates both rules then it won't work with
the IP stack, simple as that. Fortunately I don't think such a
platform exists currently on Linux.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists