lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 22:33:14 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, dsd@...too.org,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wireless vs. alignment requirements
> Then what about hardware that can't dma ethernet to non-aligned address.
> Sky2 hardware breaks if DMA is not 8 byte aligned. IMHO the IP stack should
> handle any alignment, and do the appropriate memove if the CPU requires
> alignment.
Wouldn't that better be handled in the driver rather than having the
test in the generic RX path?
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists