netdev - Re: wireless vs. alignment requirements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1195939994.4149.199.camel@johannes.berg>
Date:	Sat, 24 Nov 2007 22:33:14 +0100
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, dsd@...too.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wireless vs. alignment requirements


> Then what about hardware that can't dma ethernet to non-aligned address.
> Sky2 hardware breaks if DMA is not 8 byte aligned.  IMHO the IP stack should
> handle any alignment, and do the appropriate memove if the CPU requires 
> alignment.

Wouldn't that better be handled in the driver rather than having the
test in the generic RX path?

johannes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)