lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:36:55 +0800 From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> Cc: dsd@...too.org, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: wireless vs. alignment requirements On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 06:04:17PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > I'd think that totally depends on the traffic. If you have a non-QoS AP > with WPS upstream connection, then the traffic to stations will be > four-byte aligned while the WPS upstream will be at a 2-byte-mod-4 > boundary. And you'll have all packets from stations come in aligned and > all response packets from wherever come in as WPS. OK, sounds like you'll just have to fix them up after DMA. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists