netdev - Re: Missing audit information in xfrm_audit_common

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200711261152.03686.paul.moore@hp.com>
Date:	Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:52:03 -0500
From:	Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
To:	Joy Latten <latten@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-audit@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Missing audit information in xfrm_audit_common_policyinfo()?

On Monday 26 November 2007 11:47:09 am Joy Latten wrote:
> Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com> wrote on 11/21/2007 03:34:31 PM:
> > I just noticed that the IPsec auditing code does not appear to audit the
> >
> > netmask for the selector source and destination addresses in
> > xfrm_audit_common_policyinfo().  Before I threw a patch together I
>
> thought I
>
> > would check to see if there was a reason for this that I am missing ...
>
> I don't think we ever discussed including netmask when we added the
> ipsec audit info...

Hmmm ... okay.  I'm almost certain it should be included when auditing changes 
to the SPD as the netmask/prefixlen is very important when considering which 
traffic will be matched by a particular SPD entry.

I'm working on a patch now.

-- 
paul moore
linux security @ hp
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html