netdev - Re: bonding sysfs output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071127021418.8a05d225.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:14:18 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ferenc Wagner <wferi@...f.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bonding sysfs output

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:56:43 +0100 Ferenc Wagner <wferi@...f.hu> wrote:

> > - raise patches against the latest Linus tree
> > (ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/)
> 
> I thought it was better to change to git.  Isn't it so?

Yes, git is a bit more uptodate than the snapshots.  But if that matters
you were very unlucky.

> SubmittingPatches has nothing to say about that...
> Can I find collected best practices somewhere?  Which tree, which
> branch, how/when to rebase, format-patch, etc...

gosh.  Documentation/Submit*,
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt,
http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html, other places.  Probably people have
written books about it by now.  But don't sweat it - you're close enough ;)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html