netdev - Re: Does tc-prio really work as advertised?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071127141251.GA4291@ff.dom.local>
Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:12:51 +0100
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To:	Joerg Pommnitz <pommnitz@...oo.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Does tc-prio really work as advertised?

On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:00:55AM -0800, Joerg Pommnitz wrote:
...
> The OLSR traffic was obviously generated locally (not forwarded).
> You claim, that the TOS value for locally generated traffic does
> not influence its priority?

I wouldn't say "I claim": I've found something like this 'long time
ago' (enough to forget), and didn't need this information since
then. Now, I see you have 'nearby' problem, so it's only a hint.
After your first message I think you should be able to check this
by yourself. But, if there are any problems with this, you find my
idea wrong or not valid anymore, I'm interested in knowing about
this.

Cheers,
Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html