netdev - Re: [PATCH 4/4] atm/ambassador: kmalloc + memset conversion to kzalloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200711271440.lAREedEK011753@cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:40:39 -0500
From:	"chas williams - CONTRACTOR" <chas@....nrl.navy.mil>
To:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
cc:	Joonwoo Park <joonwpark81@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] atm/ambassador: kmalloc + memset conversion to kzalloc 

In message <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0711260619580.10766@...alhost.localdomain>,"Rober
t P. J. Day" writes:
>> > in any event, i just thought i'd point it out.  if you're absolutely
>> > sure there will never be another call to setup_dev() from somewhere
>> > else, then, yes, it's safe.
>>
>> I understood your opinions. and partially agree with you.
>> But isn't it a unfounded fear?
>
>i don't know, i just thought i'd mention it.  if no one thinks it's an
>issue, it's certainly fine with me.

its very unlikely that setup_dev() is likely to be called from another
code path.  this patch looks fine to me.  i will take it and get it
submitted on the next merge.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html