[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071127081655.40474d79@freepuppy.rosehill>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:16:55 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, bridge@...ts.osdl.org,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BRIDGE] Properly dereference the br_should_route_hook
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:12:11 +0300
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org> wrote:
> This hook is protected with the RCU, so simple
>
> if (br_should_route_hook)
> br_should_route_hook(...)
>
> is not enough on some architectures.
>
> Use the rcu_dereference/rcu_assign_pointer in this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> index 3cedd4e..b42b192 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ static inline int is_link_local(const unsigned char *dest)
> struct sk_buff *br_handle_frame(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> const unsigned char *dest = eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest;
> + typeof(br_should_route_hook) rhook;
Okay, but I don't like the typeof() magic. Resubmit with proper declartion.
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists