netdev - [PATCH 0/2] [IPSEC]: Reinject packet instead of calling netfilter directly on input

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1196369374.4437.18.camel@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:49:34 -0500
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] [IPSEC]: Reinject packet instead of calling netfilter
	directly on input

Herbert,

This is a simplified version of one of your earlier patches that never
made it in. I liked it so much that i reduced it to this and infact
given the cycles today, tested it (with transport and tunnel mode
only;->).

We re-inject a decrypted ipsec (other than tunnel mode) back and let it
bubble up the network stack. This improves debugability (since sniffers
like tcpdump can see the packet) and usability since ingress tc filters
can act on it.

Ive broken it down into two: IPv4 and IPV6. If you want to go through
the xfrm reinject() method, then I am gonna need more time to resubmit
or you be my guest and go for it and i will test it.

cheers,
jamal

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html