[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071129124717.GD12069@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:47:17 -0200
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix inet_diag.ko register vs rcv race
Em Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:37:34PM +1100, Herbert Xu escreveu:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 04:09:43PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> > The following race is possible when one cpu unregisters the handler
> > while other one is trying to receive a message and call this one:
>
> Good catch! But I think we need a bit more to close this fully.
>
> Dumps can resume asynchronously which means that they won't be
> holding inet_diag_mutex. We can fix that pretty easily by
> giving that as our cb_mutex.
>
> So could you add that to your patch and resubmit?
>
> Arnaldo, synchronize_rcu() doesn't work on its own. Whoever accesses
> the object that it's supposed to protect has to use the correct RCU
> primitives for this to work.
>
> Synchronisation is like tango, it always takes two to make it work :)
Agreed, I didn't checked that when refactoring inet_diag, leaving this
as it was before I put my hands on it :-)
- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists