[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <474EB825.8000601@openvz.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:01:25 +0300
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: [PATCH (resubmit)] Fix inet_diag.ko register vs rcv race
The following race is possible when one cpu unregisters the handler
while other one is trying to receive a message and call this one:
CPU1: CPU2:
inet_diag_rcv() inet_diag_unregister()
mutex_lock(&inet_diag_mutex);
netlink_rcv_skb(skb, &inet_diag_rcv_msg);
if (inet_diag_table[nlh->nlmsg_type] ==
NULL) /* false handler is still registered */
...
netlink_dump_start(idiagnl, skb, nlh,
inet_diag_dump, NULL);
cb = kzalloc(sizeof(*cb), GFP_KERNEL);
/* sleep here freeing memory
* or preempt
* or sleep later on nlk->cb_mutex
*/
spin_lock(&inet_diag_register_lock);
inet_diag_table[type] = NULL;
... spin_unlock(&inet_diag_register_lock);
synchronize_rcu();
/* CPU1 is sleeping - RCU quiescent
* state is passed
*/
return;
/* inet_diag_dump is finally called: */
inet_diag_dump()
handler = inet_diag_table[cb->nlh->nlmsg_type];
BUG_ON(handler == NULL);
/* OOPS! While we slept the unregister has set
* handler to NULL :(
*/
Grep showed, that the register/unregister functions are called
from init/fini module callbacks for tcp_/dccp_diag, so it's OK
to use the inet_diag_mutex to synchronize manipulations with the
inet_diag_table and the access to it.
Besides, as Herbert pointed out, asynchronous dumps should hold
this mutex as well, and thus, we provide the mutex as cb_mutex one.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
---
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c b/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
index b017073..6b3fffb 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
@@ -853,8 +853,6 @@ static void inet_diag_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
mutex_unlock(&inet_diag_mutex);
}
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(inet_diag_register_lock);
-
int inet_diag_register(const struct inet_diag_handler *h)
{
const __u16 type = h->idiag_type;
@@ -863,13 +861,13 @@ int inet_diag_register(const struct inet_diag_handler *h)
if (type >= INET_DIAG_GETSOCK_MAX)
goto out;
- spin_lock(&inet_diag_register_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&inet_diag_mutex);
err = -EEXIST;
if (inet_diag_table[type] == NULL) {
inet_diag_table[type] = h;
err = 0;
}
- spin_unlock(&inet_diag_register_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&inet_diag_mutex);
out:
return err;
}
@@ -882,11 +880,9 @@ void inet_diag_unregister(const struct inet_diag_handler *h)
if (type >= INET_DIAG_GETSOCK_MAX)
return;
- spin_lock(&inet_diag_register_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&inet_diag_mutex);
inet_diag_table[type] = NULL;
- spin_unlock(&inet_diag_register_lock);
-
- synchronize_rcu();
+ mutex_unlock(&inet_diag_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(inet_diag_unregister);
@@ -901,7 +897,7 @@ static int __init inet_diag_init(void)
goto out;
idiagnl = netlink_kernel_create(&init_net, NETLINK_INET_DIAG, 0,
- inet_diag_rcv, NULL, THIS_MODULE);
+ inet_diag_rcv, &inet_diag_mutex, THIS_MODULE);
if (idiagnl == NULL)
goto out_free_table;
err = 0;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists