[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <475057E4.3000909@myri.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:35:16 -0500
From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@...i.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, ossthema@...ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: fix lro_gen_skb() alignment
Herbert Xu wrote:
> Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@...i.com> wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c b/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c
>> index ac3b1d3..91e9371 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_lro.c
>> @@ -401,10 +401,11 @@ static struct sk_buff *lro_gen_skb(struc
>> int data_len = len;
>> int hdr_len = min(len, hlen);
>>
>> - skb = netdev_alloc_skb(lro_mgr->dev, hlen);
>> + skb = netdev_alloc_skb(lro_mgr->dev, hlen + NET_IP_ALIGN);
>
> NET_IP_ALIGN should only be used if you're DMAing into the skb head.
> Otherwise you should say 2. It would be nice to have another macro
> for that I suppose.
It is certainly simple enough to say 2. Thank you for pointing
this out. I have attached a patch to do that..
Signed off by: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@...i.com>
Drew
View attachment "lro_align_2.diff" of type "text/plain" (487 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists