[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4750660F.7000704@myri.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:35:43 -0500
From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@...i.com>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, davem@...emloft.net,
ossthema@...ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: fix lro_gen_skb() alignment
Roland Dreier wrote:
> > >> - skb = netdev_alloc_skb(lro_mgr->dev, hlen);
> > >> + skb = netdev_alloc_skb(lro_mgr->dev, hlen + NET_IP_ALIGN);
> > > NET_IP_ALIGN should only be used if you're DMAing into the skb head.
> > > Otherwise you should say 2. It would be nice to have another macro
> > > for that I suppose.
> >
> > It is certainly simple enough to say 2. Thank you for pointing
> > this out. I have attached a patch to do that..
> >
> > Signed off by: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@...i.com>
>
> Isn't the value of 2 ethernet-specific (to round the 14-byte header up
> to 16)? Given that the rest of the lro code is fairly careful to
> calculate mac_hdr_len etc it seems as if it would be cleaner to make
> this independent of the specific L2 being used.
>
> (And I plan on using the LRO module for IP-over-InfiniBand so this is
> not completely theoretical)
Good point. I tend to think all the world is ethernet.
Perhaps the better way would be to simply add an alignment pad
field to lro_mgr? When the driver initializes it, it specifies
any padding needed. Ethernet drivers would specify 2.
Is this acceptable?
Drew
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists