netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/4] datagram: mem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071201120946.GA14368@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Sat, 1 Dec 2007 23:09:46 +1100
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Hideo AOKI <haoki@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Satoshi Oshima <satoshi.oshima.fk@...achi.com>,
	Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
	Yumiko Sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] datagram: mem_scheudle functions

On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 01:52:59PM -0500, Hideo AOKI wrote:
>
> +static inline int sk_wmem_schedule(struct sock *sk, int size)
> +{
> +	if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM)
> +		return sk_stream_wmem_schedule(sk, size);
> +	else if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_DGRAM)
> +		return sk_datagram_wmem_schedule(sk, size);
> +	else
> +		return 1;
> +}

Why do we need this function? As far as I can see we always know
whether it's a stream or datagram socket at compile time so doing
a run-time test is pointless.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html