netdev - Re: [RFC][PATCHES 0/7]: Reorganization of RX history patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5640c7e00712030023k178927devf0f507d8a3c2c9f0@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Dec 2007 21:23:11 +1300
From:	"Ian McDonald" <ian.mcdonald@...di.co.nz>
To:	"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...hat.com>
Cc:	"Gerrit Renker" <gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	dccp@...r.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHES 0/7]: Reorganization of RX history patches

On 12/3/07, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com> wrote:
> WARNING: After reading some messages from Ingo Molnar on lkml I think we should really
>          trim the number of lists we use for kernel development. And since I moved
>          back to using mutt for reading e-mails, something I should have never, ever
>          stopped doing, I guess we should move the DCCP discussions to netdev,
>          where we hopefully can get more people interested and reviewing the work we
>          do, so please consider moving DCCP discussion to netdev@...r.kernel.org,
>          where lots of smart networking folks are present and can help our efforts
>          on turning RFCs to code.
>
I (and others too) don't necessarily have time to read netdev so would
vote on keeping dccp. I would totally agree to making sure that
cross-post to netdev as well as dccp.

Ian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html