[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4753EB22.5040603@balabit.hu>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:40:18 +0100
From: Laszlo Attila Toth <panther@...abit.hu>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 2/5] rtnetlink: send a single notification on device
state changes
Jarek Poplawski írta:
> Laszlo Attila Toth wrote, On 11/29/2007 05:11 PM:
>
>> In do_setlink() a single ntification is sent at the end of the function
>> if any modification occured. If the address has been changed, another
>> notification is sent.
>
>
> ...
>
>> @@ -858,6 +859,7 @@ static int do_setlink(struct net_device *dev, struct ifinfomsg *ifm,
>> if (tb[IFLA_BROADCAST]) {
>> nla_memcpy(dev->broadcast, tb[IFLA_BROADCAST], dev->addr_len);
>> send_addr_notify = 1;
>> + modified = 1;
>> }
>
> ..
>
>> if (send_addr_notify)
>> call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_CHANGEADDR, dev);
>> +
>> + if (modified)
>> + netdev_state_change(dev);
>> +
>
> The subject suggests there might be less notifications. The patch actually
> adds a little. Any additional comment why they are necessary?
The actual state of a device contains its address(es), also address
change implies state change, but these are different netlink messages
also the NETDEV_CHANGEADDR cannot be dropped because the other one is used.
Attila
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists