netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] netem: trace enhancement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47559119.6070803@candelatech.com>
Date:	Tue, 04 Dec 2007 09:40:41 -0800
From:	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To:	Ariane Keller <ariane.keller@....ee.ethz.ch>
CC:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	Rainer Baumann <baumann@....ee.ethz.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] netem: trace enhancement

Ariane Keller wrote:
>
> Increasing the cache size to say 32k for each buffer would be no problem.
> Is this enough?
Maybe just a variable length list of 4k buffers chained together?  Its 
usually easier
to get 4k chunks of memory than 32k chunks, especially under high 
network load,
and if you go ahead an make it arbitrary length, then each user can 
determine how many
they want to have queued...

Thanks,
Ben


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com> 
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html