[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4756B175.5010108@psc.edu>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 09:11:01 -0500
From: John Heffner <jheffner@....edu>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP event tracking via netlink...
David Miller wrote:
> Ilpo, I was pondering the kind of debugging one does to find
> congestion control issues and even SACK bugs and it's currently too
> painful because there is no standard way to track state changes.
>
> I assume you're using something like carefully crafted printk's,
> kprobes, or even ad-hoc statistic counters. That's what I used to do
> :-)
>
> With that in mind it occurred to me that we might want to do something
> like a state change event generator.
>
> Basically some application or even a daemon listens on this generic
> netlink socket family we create. The header of each event packet
> indicates what socket the event is for and then there is some state
> information.
>
> Then you can look at a tcpdump and this state dump side by side and
> see what the kernel decided to do.
>
> Now there is the question of granularity.
>
> A very important consideration in this is that we want this thing to
> be enabled in the distributions, therefore it must be cheap. Perhaps
> one test at the end of the packet input processing.
>
> So I say we pick some state to track (perhaps start with tcp_info)
> and just push that at the end of every packet input run. Also,
> we add some minimal filtering capability (match on specific IP
> address and/or port, for example).
>
> Maybe if we want to get really fancy we can have some more-expensive
> debug mode where detailed specific events get generated via some
> macros we can scatter all over the place. This won't be useful
> for general user problem analysis, but it will be excellent for
> developers.
>
> Let me know if you think this is useful enough and I'll work on
> an implementation we can start playing with.
FWIW, sounds similar to what these guys are doing with SIFTR for FreeBSD:
http://caia.swin.edu.au/urp/newtcp/tools.html
http://caia.swin.edu.au/reports/070824A/CAIA-TR-070824A.pdf
-John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists