[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071205035345.GA12855@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:53:45 +1100
From: David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: jgarzik@...ox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/11] ibm_newemac: Skip EMACs that are marked unused by
the firmware
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:14:30AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> From: Hugh Blemings <hugh@...mings.org>
>
> Depending on how the 44x processors are wired, some EMAC cells
> might not be useable (and not connected to a PHY). However, some
> device-trees may choose to still expose them (since their registers
> are present in the MMIO space) but with an "unused" property in
> them.
It occurred to me the other day. Instead of using a new "unused"
property for this, should we be using the OF standard "status"
property.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists