[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <475669B0.4030501@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:04:48 +0800
From: Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] [UDP]: Restore missing inDatagrams increments
Herbert Xu said the following on 2007-12-5 17:02:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 04:39:48PM +0800, Wang Chen wrote:
>> Herbert Xu said the following on 2007-12-5 10:15:
>>> +#define UDPX_INC_STATS_BH(sk, field) \
>>> + do { \
>>> + if ((sk)->sk_family == AF_INET) \
>>> + UDP_INC_STATS_BH(field, 0); \
>>> + else \
>>> + UDP6_INC_STATS_BH(field, 0); \
>>> + } while (0);
>>> +
>> Because there are lot of address families, not only AF_INET
>> and AF_INET6.
>
> There may be a lot of families but only two run UDP, or rather, only
> two are supported by sunrpc :)
>
Yes, now, sunrpc only supports INET and INET6.
But UDPX_INC_STATS_BH is defined in udp.h, in case others use it :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists