[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071206074946.GA2164@ff.dom.local>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 08:49:47 +0100
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To: Mitsuru Chinen <mitch@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [IPv4] Reply net unreachable ICMP message
On 06-12-2007 07:31, Mitsuru Chinen wrote:
> IPv4 stack doesn't reply any ICMP destination unreachable message
> with net unreachable code when IP detagrams are being discarded
> because of no route could be found in the forwarding path.
> Incidentally, IPv6 stack replies such ICMPv6 message in the similar
> situation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mitsuru Chinen <mitch@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/route.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
> index 6714bbc..ba85ec9 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
> @@ -1375,6 +1375,7 @@ static int ip_error(struct sk_buff *skb)
> break;
> case ENETUNREACH:
> code = ICMP_NET_UNREACH;
> + IP_INC_STATS_BH(IPSTATS_MIB_INNOROUTES);
> break;
> case EACCES:
> code = ICMP_PKT_FILTERED;
> @@ -2004,6 +2005,7 @@ no_route:
> RT_CACHE_STAT_INC(in_no_route);
> spec_dst = inet_select_addr(dev, 0, RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE);
> res.type = RTN_UNREACHABLE;
> + err = -ENETUNREACH;
> goto local_input;
>
> /*
This patch seems to be wrong. It overrides err codes from
fib_lookup, where such decisions should be made.
Regards,
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists