netdev - Re: [Patch] net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c: Some small improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:37:46 +0100
From:	Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, akpm@...l.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c: Some small improvements

David Miller wrote:
> From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 19:01:23 +0800
>
>   
>> This patch contains the following changes.
>>
>> 	- Use 'bool' instead of 'int' for booleans.
>> 	- Use 'size_t' instead of 'int' for 'sizeof' return value.
>> 	- Some style fixes.
>>
>> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
>> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>>     
>
> Normally I would let a patch like this sit in my mailbox
> for a week and then delete it.
>   
That is evil! ;)
> But this time I'll just let you know up front that I
> don't see much value in this patch.  It is not a clear
> improvement to replace int's with bool's in my mind and
> the other changes are just whitespace changes.
>   
Is it not an improvement to distinct booleans from actual values? Do you 
use integers for ASCII characters too? It can also avoid some potential 
bugs like the 'if (i == TRUE)'...
What is wrong with 'size_t' (since it is unsigned, compared to (some) 
'int')?

/Richard Knutsson

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html