netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] cxgb3 - Parity initialization for T3C adapters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4759E200.3050607@chelsio.com>
Date:	Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:14:56 -0800
From:	Divy Le Ray <divy@...lsio.com>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>, wenxiong@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cxgb3 - Parity initialization for T3C adapters

Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Divy Le Ray wrote:
> > Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >> Divy Le Ray wrote:
> >>> From: Divy Le Ray <divy@...lsio.com>
> >>>
> >>> Add parity initialization for T3C adapters.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Divy Le Ray <divy@...lsio.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>>  drivers/net/cxgb3/adapter.h       |    1
> >>>  drivers/net/cxgb3/cxgb3_main.c    |   82 ++++++++++++
> >>>  drivers/net/cxgb3/cxgb3_offload.c |   15 ++
> >>>  drivers/net/cxgb3/regs.h          |  248
> >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>  drivers/net/cxgb3/sge.c           |   24 +++-
> >>>  drivers/net/cxgb3/t3_hw.c         |  131 +++++++++++++++++---
> >>>  6 files changed, 472 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> dropped patches 2-3, did not apply
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Hi Jeff,
> >
> > I noticed that you applied the first one of this 3 patches series to the
> > #upstream-fixes branch.
> > These patches are intended to the #upstream (2.6.25) branch, as they are
> > built on top of the
> > last 10 patches committed - 9 from me, and the white space clean up
> > (thanks!).
> > May be this is the reason why they did not apply.
>
> Ah... you need to tell me these things.  I looked for a kernel version
> in your messages but did not see one.
>
I had put it in the introduction mail, I should have added the kernel 
version in the patch titles.
I'll do from now on.

>
> Does the patch #1 need to be reverted for 2.6.24?
>
No, it can be applied to 2.6.24.
The 2 next patches seem to apply cleanly on #upstream when patch #1 is 
popped out the patch stack.

>
> > On this topic, I have a question: how do I get to see all the netdev-2.6
> > branches ?
>
>
> git fetch -f $NETDEV_URL upstream:upstream
>
> copies the latest upstream branch from netdev-2.6.git, and stores it as
> your local upstream branch.
>
> You may do the same for #upstream-fixes too.
>

That made it.
Thanks a lot!

Cheers,
Divy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html