[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200712111239.19709.paul.moore@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:39:19 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-audit@...hat.com,
selinux@...ho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] XFRM: assorted IPsec fixups
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 12:21:26 pm David Miller wrote:
> From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:15:00 -0500
>
> > I still would like to see the rest of the changes make it into
> > 2.6.25 (the SPI byte order thing is particularly troublesome) so if
> > you don't mind a "v3" I'll respin this patch right now to remove the
> > "sid -> secid" bits.
>
> Technically this could break anything parsing the audit logs, but no
> matter, I'd rather fix this now while we still can.
True, this does change how userspace sees things but I think that any
userspace code that currently uses this SPI value successfully is either
lucky or has a workaround/hack in place.
> I would classify the spi endianness bit as a bug fix, could you please
> just split out that fix for net-2.6, then we can make a second patch
> after I rebase net-2.6.25 which can do the rest of your patch sans the
> linux/xfrm.h change?
Sure. Although that's enough of a change that I'd want to retest the patch a
bit first. If I can't get it done today expect something in your inbox
tomorrow.
Thanks for your patience.
--
paul moore
linux security @ hp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists