[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <475E4F42.8060102@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:50:10 +0800
From: Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] NET: Fix wrong comments for unregister_net*
[PATCH] NET: Fix wrong comments for unregister_net*
There are some return value comments for void functions.
Fixed it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>
---
dev.c | 6 ++----
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.24.rc4.org/net/core/dev.c 2007-12-11 16:40:36.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-2.6.24.rc4/net/core/dev.c 2007-12-11 16:42:40.000000000 +0800
@@ -3959,8 +3959,7 @@ void synchronize_net(void)
* @dev: device
*
* This function shuts down a device interface and removes it
- * from the kernel tables. On success 0 is returned, on a failure
- * a negative errno code is returned.
+ * from the kernel tables.
*
* Callers must hold the rtnl semaphore. You may want
* unregister_netdev() instead of this.
@@ -3978,8 +3977,7 @@ void unregister_netdevice(struct net_dev
* @dev: device
*
* This function shuts down a device interface and removes it
- * from the kernel tables. On success 0 is returned, on a failure
- * a negative errno code is returned.
+ * from the kernel tables.
*
* This is just a wrapper for unregister_netdevice that takes
* the rtnl semaphore. In general you want to use this and not
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists