netdev - Re: [PATCH 8/8] [PATCH v2] [CCID3]: Interface CCID3 code with newer Loss Intervals Database

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071211094238.GA9926@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date:	Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:42:38 +0000
From:	Gerrit Renker <gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>, dccp@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] [PATCH v2] [CCID3]: Interface CCID3 code with newer Loss Intervals Database

| When interfacing we must make sure that ccid3 tfrc_lh_slab is created
| and then tfrc_li_cachep is not needed. I'm doing this while keeping
| the structure of the patches, i.e. one introducing, the other removing.
| But we need to create tfrc_lh_slab if we want the tree to be bisectable.
| 
| I'm doing this and keeping your Signed-off-line, please holler if you
| disagree for some reason.
If you are just shifting and reordering then that is fine with me. But
it seems you mean a different patch since in this one there is no slab
initialisation. 
The loss history and the RX/TX packet history slabs are all created in
tfrc.c using the three different __init routines of the dccp_tfrc_lib.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html