| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20071211.022724.142575368.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 02:27:24 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: den@...ru Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, den@...nvz.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.25] netns: struct net content re-work From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@...ru> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:33:45 +0300 > Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > The idea of separate structures make sense, and seems needed and useful. > > > > "Denis V. Lunev" <den@...nvz.org> writes: > > > >> diff --git a/include/net/netns/unix.h b/include/net/netns/unix.h > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 0000000..27b4e7f > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/include/net/netns/unix.h > > ^^^^^^ > > Given that we are making this per protocol adding a separate directory > > to hold them seems to be the wrong grouping. Ideally we want everything > > for the protocol all together in the same location so it is easy > > to find. Possibly with a user/kernel split. > > > > So perhaps unix_net.h > The idea was simple: > - I can name 5 files right now > - I want them to be shown to gather by ls > - so, there are 2 ways, namely: > # include/net/netns/unix.h > # include/net/netns-unix.h I have no real objection to the new directory. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists