lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b25c3fa70712110457g2bf04c6flc387f2b9cb51cf3b@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:57:02 +0900
From:	"Joonwoo Park" <joonwpark81@...il.com>
To:	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [NET]: Fix Ooops of napi net_rx_action.

2007/12/11, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
> From: "Joonwoo Park" <joonwpark81@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:13:34 +0900
>
> Joonwoo-ssi annyoung haseyo,

Wow Great! :-)

> How can the NAPI_STATE_SCHED bit be cleared externally yet we take
> this list_move_tail() code path?
>
> If NAPI_STATE_SCHED is cleared, work will be zero which will never be
> equal to 'weight', and this we'll never attempt the list_move_tail().
>
> If something clears NAPI_STATE_SCHED meanwhile, we have a serious race
> and your patch is an incomplete bandaid.  For example, if it can
> happen, then a case like:
>
>                if (test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &n->state))
>        ... something clears NAPI_STATE_SCHED right now ...
>                        work = n->poll(n, weight);
>
> can crash too.
>

David,
With your suggestions, I'm feeling a doubt at e1000.
It's seems to me e1000_clean does call netif_rx_complete and returns
non-zero work_done when !netif_running()
So net_rx_action has (work == weight) as true with NAPI_STATE_SCHED cleared.

Here is the e1000_clean.

static int
e1000_clean(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
{
    /* Keep link state information with original netdev */
    if (!netif_carrier_ok(poll_dev))
        goto quit_polling;

...

    adapter->clean_rx(adapter, &adapter->rx_ring[0],
                      &work_done, budget);

    /* If no Tx and not enough Rx work done, exit the polling mode */
    if ((!tx_cleaned && (work_done == 0)) ||
       !netif_running(poll_dev)) {
quit_polling:
        if (likely(adapter->itr_setting & 3))
            e1000_set_itr(adapter);
        netif_rx_complete(poll_dev, napi);
        e1000_irq_enable(adapter);
    }

    return work_done;
}

Thanks.
Joonwoo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ