[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <475DE7C5.30201@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:28:37 -0500
From: Hideo AOKI <haoki@...hat.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Satoshi Oshima <satoshi.oshima.fk@...achi.com>,
Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
Yumiko Sugita <yumiko.sugita.yf@...achi.com>, haoki@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] udp: memory accounting in IPv4
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:28:34PM -0500, Hideo AOKI wrote:
>> 1. Using sk_forward_alloc and adding socket lock
>>
>> UDP already uses a socket lock to send message. However, it doesn't
>> use the lock to receive message. I wonder if we can also use the
>> lock when sk_forward_alloc is updated in receive processing.
>> I understand performance issue might occur, but ...
>
> Having discussed this with Dave we've agreed that this is the
> best way to go.
>
> Thanks,
Hello,
Thank you so much for reviewing.
I chose this solution and developed new patch set.
I'm testing the patch set right now.
I'll submit it to netdev as soon as I finish the test.
Best regards,
Hideo
--
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists