lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:52:54 +0800 From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> To: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...edu> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, latten@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net Subject: Re: [IPSEC] RFC 4301 PFP Support On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 01:34:45PM -0800, Tyler Hicks wrote: > > Should we just use the larval selectors or should we assume that > openswan will begin to send valid selectors? I asked for the openswan > dev's opinions and they referred me to Herbert Xu. It seems as though > the correct solution would be for openswan to pass valid selectors in > UPDSA messages, even if it is the larval selectors we gave them. Yes we should patch openswan to generate the correct SA selectors. With the previous standard SA selectors were redundant due to the presence of policy selectors. But with RFC 4301 the KM should start setting them. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists