netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/4] ixp2000: rtnl_lock out of loop will be faster

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:01:58 +0100
From:	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
To:	Wang Chen <wangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ixp2000: rtnl_lock out of loop will be faster

On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 04:48:28PM +0800, Wang Chen wrote:

> [PATCH 3/4] [NETDEV] ixp2000: rtnl_lock out of loop will be faster
> 
> Before this patch, it gets and releases the lock at each
> iteration of the loop. Changing unregister_netdev to
> unregister_netdevice and locking outside of the loop will
> be faster for this approach.

Since the number of net devices is typically either 2 or 3 (depending
on the specific model card you're using), and this is not in any kind
of hot path at all, I don't see a whole lot of benefit of acquiring
the RTNL separately.  Besides, I'm slightly worried about putting
knowledge of the RTNL into the driver directly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html