netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] cxgb3 - Parity initialization for T3C adapters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47630C3B.602@chelsio.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:05:31 -0800
From:	Divy Le Ray <divy@...lsio.com>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>, wenxiong@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cxgb3 - Parity initialization for T3C adapters

Divy Le Ray wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>
>> Divy Le Ray wrote:
>> > Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> >> Divy Le Ray wrote:
>> >>> From: Divy Le Ray <divy@...lsio.com>
>> >>>
>> >>> Add parity initialization for T3C adapters.
>> >>>
>> >>> Signed-off-by: Divy Le Ray <divy@...lsio.com>
>> >>> ---
>> >>>
>> >>>  drivers/net/cxgb3/adapter.h       |    1
>> >>>  drivers/net/cxgb3/cxgb3_main.c    |   82 ++++++++++++
>> >>>  drivers/net/cxgb3/cxgb3_offload.c |   15 ++
>> >>>  drivers/net/cxgb3/regs.h          |  248
>> >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>>  drivers/net/cxgb3/sge.c           |   24 +++-
>> >>>  drivers/net/cxgb3/t3_hw.c         |  131 +++++++++++++++++---
>> >>>  6 files changed, 472 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> dropped patches 2-3, did not apply
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > Hi Jeff,
>> >
>> > I noticed that you applied the first one of this 3 patches series 
>> to the
>> > #upstream-fixes branch.
>> > These patches are intended to the #upstream (2.6.25) branch, as 
>> they are
>> > built on top of the
>> > last 10 patches committed - 9 from me, and the white space clean up
>> > (thanks!).
>> > May be this is the reason why they did not apply.
>>
>> Ah... you need to tell me these things.  I looked for a kernel version
>> in your messages but did not see one.
>>
> I had put it in the introduction mail, I should have added the kernel 
> version in the patch titles.
> I'll do from now on.
>
>>
>> Does the patch #1 need to be reverted for 2.6.24?
>>
> No, it can be applied to 2.6.24.
> The 2 next patches seem to apply cleanly on #upstream when patch #1 is 
> popped out the patch stack.
>
Hi Jeff,

Did you get a chance to apply these patches #upstream ?

Cheers,
Divy


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html