netdev - Re: Regression: Wireshark sees no packets in 2.6.24-rc3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:16:34 -0800
From:	"Ray Lee" <ray@...rabbit.org>
To:	"Gabriel C" <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression: Wireshark sees no packets in 2.6.24-rc3

On Dec 14, 2007 11:09 PM, Ray Lee <ray@...rabbit.org> wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2007 6:41 PM, Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com> wrote:
> Correct, absolutely no traffic. So if it works for you, then either
> it's something that got fixed between -rc3 and -rc5, or something odd
> when I did a make oldconfig, I suppose. (Or because I'm on an x86-64
> kernel?) Regardless, -rc5 is currently building, and I'll try it in
> the morning.

-rc5 works great. Really don't know what's different between my -rc3
and -rc5 builds. The diff of .config between the two doesn't show
anything obvious, so perhaps it was something fixed in the interim.

I've gone ahead and closed the bugzilla entry, btw. Thanks, and sorry
for the false (or tardy) alarm.

Ray
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html