[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071216154621.c7e2a3e9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:46:21 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, berrange@...hat.com,
jeff@...zik.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, rjw@...k.pl
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bridge: assign random address
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:40:18 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:34:42 -0800
>
> > Take a look at the git logs, see what most other people are doing.
>
> You're talking bucking a convention that has been used
> for all networking changes since we starting using real
> revision control.
>
> I've shown how the subject lines can be done in a way
> that both satisfies the scripts you're worried about
> and keeps the networking changes looking the way they
> have for 5+ years.
>
> What's the reason to change again?
I see no particular reason to change - it's just one of those things.
Two third of commits don't use [subsystem] and 90% don't use trailing
period. Reasons to change would be a) consistency and b) the time it takes
to occasionally fix up patches which use [subsystem] as I earlier
described.
I don't think these are terribly important, really.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists