[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071217.120748.51571249.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:07:48 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: linville@...driver.com
Cc: jeff@...zik.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please pull 'fixes-jgarzik' branch of wireless-2.6
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:34:02 -0500
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 11:31:48PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
>
> > Cyrill Gorcunov (2):
> > ieee80211_rate: missed unlock
>
> > net/mac80211/ieee80211_rate.c | 1 +
>
> > diff --git a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_rate.c b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_rate.c
> > index 7254bd6..3260a4a 100644
> > --- a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_rate.c
> > +++ b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_rate.c
> > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ int ieee80211_rate_control_register(struct rate_control_ops *ops)
> > if (!strcmp(alg->ops->name, ops->name)) {
> > /* don't register an algorithm twice */
> > WARN_ON(1);
> > + mutex_unlock(&rate_ctrl_mutex);
> > return -EALREADY;
> > }
> > }
>
> Crud...there is a one-line fix in here that should have gone to Dave.
>
> Jeff, (assuming Dave ACKs it) would you mind just taking it your
> way along with the other posted patches? Since this is intended for
> 2.6.24, there should be no great maintenance hardship if it goes to
> Linus through your tree instead of Dave's.
It's totally fine if Jeff takes this, don't worry so much about
it :-)
And yes the change looks fine to me too :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists