netdev - Re: [0/4] DST: Distributed storage.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071218110847.GB4193@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date:	Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:08:47 +0300
From:	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To:	David Chinner <dgc@....com>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [0/4] DST: Distributed storage.

Hi David.

On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:00:04PM +1100, David Chinner (dgc@....com) wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:03:38PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > DST passed all FS tests in LTP with XFS (modulo MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low bug:
> > [ 8398.605691] BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low!
> > [ 8398.609641] turning off the locking correctness validator.
> 
> Evgeniy, can you please start reporting these XFS problems you are
> coming across to the XFS list (xfs@....sgi.com)? They may be
> real issues that we need to address and we should not be hearing
> about them for the first time in the release notes for a block
> device project....

It is not XFS as is, but lock validator warning. I just found it
working with XFS - it can be anything else: VFS, block layer, DST itself
(there is number of locks too), so I did not fill the bug against
filesystem, but pointed that some problem, probalby harmless,
exists in tested environment.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html