[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071218145707.GV11220@postel.suug.ch>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:57:07 +0100
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: Mark Seger <Mark.Seger@...com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: update frequency for stats in /proc/net/dev
* Mark Seger <Mark.Seger@...com> 2007-12-18 08:37
> Anyhow, I just wanted to let people know that ALL tools that monitor
> once a second on older counters will get the wrong numbers and tools
> that correct for the wrong number by using fractional intervals (and I
> suspect mine is the only one that does) but run on newer kernels will
> also get the wrong numbers. In any event, if anyone is interested in
> trying out collectl - it monitors a LOT more than just networks - you
> can snag a copy of from http://collectl.sourceforge.net/ if you'd like
> to take if for a drive. The website has a lot of output examples to
> give you a better idea what it can do. I even included a writeup about
> the odd network performance observations at
> http://collectl.sourceforge.net/NetworkStats.html
I've solved this problem by using netlink to read the interface counters
ten times per second and maintain an own counter from which I calculate
the rate exactly once per second/minute/hour. The rate per second may
still be inaccurate to some degree, therefore I keep a history of 2-5
rates and take them into account to smoothen the result. This works
fairly well with _all_ operating systems.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists