netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: neighbor timer power saving

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <82e4877d0712201016qe920d68lf9f7eb8c8f117265@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:16:21 -0500
From:	"Parag Warudkar" <parag.warudkar@...il.com>
To:	"Stephen Hemminger" <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Eric Dumazet" <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: neighbor timer power saving

On Dec 20, 2007 12:10 PM, Stephen Hemminger
<shemminger@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> Thinking about it more, this looks like a case for just using round_jiffies().
> The GC timer needs to run to clean up under DoS attack, and deferring it probably
> isn't a good idea.

But what are the chances that a DoSed machine will be idling which
will prevent the GC timer to run? I would think there would be lot of
other activities going on (including non-deferrable timers running)
that will avoid this situation?

Parag
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html