netdev - Re: [PATCH] e1000e: Use deferrable timer for watchdog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <476AB932.8050606@intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:49:22 -0800
From:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To:	Parag Warudkar <parag.warudkar@...il.com>
CC:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000e: Use deferrable timer for watchdog

Parag Warudkar wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2007 12:05 PM, Kok, Auke <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com> wrote:
>> I can't even apply this patch and the e1000 one... not only is it whitespace
>> damaged it is also not properly formatted as patch at all. If you want me to take
>> these patches seriously, then please fix the formatting issues.
> 
> Sigh - I use Pine, follow Documents/email-clients.txt for the
> recommended settings and obviously the pathces are not generated with
> whitespace damage at my end as I test those before sending out.
> 
> So although I hate to see this happen there is nothing at this moment
> that I can do - except for attaching the patch instead of inlining it.
> Since they have already been reviewed inline, please see if the
> attached patches work for you.

here's what the files in my Maildir spool look like in vim (my vim displays a '»'
char for tabs and a "¶" for EOL):

 76 --- linux-2.6/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c»      2007-12-07 10:04:39.00000000
 77 +++ linux-2.6-work/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c» 2007-12-18 20:45:59.00000000
 78 @@ -3899,7 +3899,7 @@¶
 79   »     »       goto err_eeprom;¶
 80   »     }¶
 81 ¶
 82 -»      init_timer(&adapter->watchdog_timer);¶
 83 +»      init_timer_deferrable(&adapter->watchdog_timer);¶
 84   »     adapter->watchdog_timer.function = &e1000_watchdog;¶
 85   »     adapter->watchdog_timer.data = (unsigned long) adapter;¶
 86 ¶
 87 --¶

notice that there are two spaces instead of 1. Also there's no line heading the
diff with 'diff a/foo b/foo' which is what throws of stg. And the -p option is
missing.


as for content, the patch looks OK with me. I ran the numbers and allthough there
was a slight average delay in the link up detection time it is negligeable (less
than 0.2sec difference over a bunch of measurements), and I confirmed your
powertop numbers are correct. As for the timer interval, the watchdog may already
be delayed up to 3 seconds safely, this doesn't change that.

I'll forward the patch, Care to make one for e100? plenty of laptops with those
still around! The embedded guys would love it I think.

Thanks,

Auke

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html