netdev - Re: [PATCH/RFC] [v2] TCP: use non-delayed ACK for congestion control RTT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:05:48 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	Gavin.McCullagh@...m.ie
Cc:	ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] [v2] TCP: use non-delayed ACK for congestion
 control RTT

From: Gavin McCullagh <Gavin.McCullagh@...m.ie>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:31:06 +0000

> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, David Miller wrote:
> 
> > When Gavin respins the patch I'll look at in the context of submitting
> > it as a bug fix.  So Gavin please generate the patch against Linus's
> > vanilla GIT tree or net-2.6, your choise.
> 
> The existing patch was against Linus' linux-2.6.git from a few days ago so
> I've updated my tree and regenerated the patch (below).  Is that the right
> one?

Yep, it is.

> I need to re-read properly, but I think the same problem affects the
> microsecond values where TCP_CONG_RTT_STAMP is set (used by vegas, veno,
> yeah, illinois).  I might follow up with another patch which changes the
> behaviour where TCP_CONG_RTT_STAMP when I'm more sure of that.

Ok, let us know what you find.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html