netdev - Re: Top 10 kernel oopses/warnings for the week of December 21st 2007

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:30:45 +0100
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Top 10 kernel oopses/warnings for the week of December 21st 2007

Andi Kleen wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com> writes:
> 
>> 	
>> Rank 8: __change_page_attr
>> 	BUG at arch/x86/mm/pageattr_64.c:176
>> 	Reported 2 times
>> 	Reported this week for 2.6.24-rc5; history goes back to 2.6.15
> 
> There is no BUG on this line on 2.6.24-rc5.   Since there are many
> BUG_ONs in this file it is unclear which you mean.
> 
> Could you always include the version of the kernel where the actual
> oops in the line came from?

in this case this is really all the version information available ;(
it seems to be a patched kernel without patched EXTRAVERSION.
But in the future if I have more specific information (eg it's only 1 kernel version) I'll mention it in more detail.
It gets unwieldy if there's 500 reports for an oops of course ;)

> 
> Anyways there are a lot of third party modules who do strange 
> things with c_p_a(), not always legal, so you might look up out for that 
> pattern too. Perhaps report the out of tree modules loaded in the 
> summary too?

I already always will mention if the oops is tainted or not (that I track specifically);
I'll keep an eye out for other non-tainting out of tree modules as well.

Thanks for the suggestions.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html