netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/4] [CORE]: datagram: basic memory accounting functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:31:05 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	haoki@...hat.com
Cc:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	tyasui@...hat.com, mhiramat@...hat.com,
	satoshi.oshima.fk@...achi.com, billfink@...dspring.com,
	andi@...stfloor.org, johnpol@....mipt.ru,
	shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
	yumiko.sugita.yf@...achi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] [CORE]: datagram: basic memory accounting functions

From: Hideo AOKI <haoki@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:18:54 -0500

> > Also, the memory accounting is done at different parts in
> > the socket code paths for stream vs. datagram.  This is why
> > everything is inconsistent, and, a mess.
> 
> Could you tell me more detailed information?

I think the core thing is that TCP and INET protocols call into
the memory accounting internally, either inside their own code
paths or with inet_*() helpers.

This is versus what we really want is everything happening via generic
sk_foo() helpers.

If that's what's happening already, great, just consolidate the
datagram vs. stream stuff and it should be good.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html