[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071223.220447.56355925.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 22:04:47 +0900 (JST)
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To: hadi@...erus.ca
Cc: dshwatrz@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kaber@...sh.net, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6][NEIGH] Updating affected neighbours when about
MAC address change
In article <1198413975.4423.65.camel@...alhost> (at Sun, 23 Dec 2007 07:46:15 -0500), jamal <hadi@...erus.ca> says:
> On Sun, 2007-23-12 at 21:38 +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
> > In article <31436f4a0712230424n1cfaeb27o463e62093af41090@...l.gmail.com> (at Sun, 23 Dec 2007 14:24:00 +0200), "David Shwatrz" <dshwatrz@...il.com> says:
> >
> > > Regarding your answer; I accept it and I will soon send a revised
> > > version of this patch (making changes to
> > > arp_netdev_event() and ndisc_netdev_event().)
> > > I had IPv4 in mind, there is no reason that it will no be also in IPv6.
> >
> > You should iterate all of ifa_list (for IPv4) / addr_list (for IPv6).
> > For IPv6, we also have anycast (maintained by ac_list) as well.
> >
>
> Hrm, how is this going to work for the case of multiple MACs on a
> device?
> Changing one MAC address doesnt equate to issuing a grat arp with _the
> new MAC_ for all ifa (given each MAC may be map to a different ifa)
If the secondary MACs are used with ARP/NDP, we should take care of
that, but I think we use the primary MAC for ARP/NDP, no?
(In other words, we always use primary MAC for ARP reply / NA, no?)
--yoshfuji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists